Index

Click on subject of interest shown on the right under the heading "labels" to see all relevant posts

To look at letters (and some replies) sent to politicians and newspapers, scroll down the index on the right hand side and select the appropriate heading.

Note the blog allows multiple labelling and all letters to politicians are under "letters to pollies".

If you scroll down and cannot go further, look out for icon "Older Posts". Click on that to continue




13.8.15

Tanya Plibersek response to emails on Labor Party Conference 2015

Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 11:16 AM
To: 'Mike'
Subject: RE: Asylum seekers

Dear Mike,

Thank you for contacting me about asylum-seeker policy.  I note that you wrote to me before Labor’s National Conference, I hope that you have now had a chance to look at the policy we adopted at the conference. It sets out a new policy framework for Labor, including the commitment that by 2025 Australia will have the highest per capita intake of refugees in the world, and the second largest annual intake overall behind the United States. 

As the daughter of migrants who came to Australia after the end of WWII, and as the mother of three children, I am and will always remain a strong advocate for the humane treatment of asylum seekers.

Migration has made this country great. We should never forget the debt we owe to generations of migrants and refugees who, in seeking a better life, have made Australia a better place for all of us.

Ever since the ‘Tampa’ election of 2001, domestic politics around asylum seeker policies has been nothing less than toxic.  The debate has lost rationality, compassion and respect.  I firmly believe Labor is the only party that can ‘re-set’ this debate, change the conversation, and permanently end the divisive politics regarding asylum seeker policy in this country.

At the end of WWII there were between 20-30 million refugees displaced by the war.  Today there is an estimated 59.5 million individuals forcibly displaced around the globe as a result of persecution, conflict, violence and human rights violations. 

My view is that as a wealthy nation Australia has a moral obligation to do more to address this global humanitarian crisis.  We must accept significantly more refugees to our country and we must treat those refugees more humanely. I have been calling for an increase to our refugee intake since the Abbott government cut the number from 20,000 a year under Labor, to 13,750.

We want to bring more refugees to Australia, and we want them to get here safely.

Australia played a critical role in the establishment of the United Nations in 1945 because we believed then that we have responsibilities as a good global citizen.

The Abbott government has cut $11.3 billion from our aid budget. That makes it much more difficult for Australian aid to help desperate people in their home countries, or in countries of first asylum.

We should be doing much more to support bodies like the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), which is struggling to care for an unprecedented number of refugees.

Australia must also support and seek always to operate in accordance with international human rights law.

Labor’s new policy regarding refugees and asylum seekers commits absolutely to such a framework. It massively increases Australia’s contributions to the UNHCR, it prioritises the UN Refugee Convention and restores references to the Convention in our domestic law, and most importantly it doubles Australia’s humanitarian refugee intake to 27,000 a year.

As I said above, under Labor’s policy, by 2025 Australia will have the highest per capita intake of refugees in the world, and the second largest annual intake overall behind the United States.

In relation to support for the UNHCR, Labor’s policy provides $450 million over three years.  This will make Australia the fifth largest donor globally to the international body, and provide an enormous boost to an agency whose entire regional budget is currently only $560 million a year. At the moment we give just $21 million per annum to the UNHCR.

As part of this contribution, a Shorten Labor Government will take a leadership role within South East Asia and the Pacific to build a regional humanitarian framework for asylum seekers.  This will include supporting the UNHCR in providing health and education services to asylum seekers and advocating for work rights for asylum seekers.

We will abolish Temporary Protection Visas which currently keep people in a permanent state of limbo, and give those found to be genuine refugees a permanent Australian visa.

Labor will end the secrecy surrounding the treatment of asylum seekers in this country.  We will implement independent oversight of all Australian-funded processing facilities, both offshore and onshore.

We will make sure that refugee claims are processed as quickly as possible, by restoring access to the Refugee Review Tribunal, and re-instating the ’90 day rule’ for reporting on the progress of a refugee’s claim.

Most importantly, Labor will establish an independent children's advocate and will remove children from detention as quickly as possible.

The children’s advocate will be an independent statutory position and a strong voice separate from government, serving only the interests of children seeking asylum.  Labor will legislate to impose mandatory reporting of any child abuse in all facilities.

Labor will continue to ensure that those working in the immigration system enjoy the benefit of whistle-blower protections so that they can safely speak out about abuse, maladministration and corruption.

No one wants to see further deaths at sea, and the only way to truly prevent this is to provide for quick, safe, processing of claims through the appropriate international bodies, at facilities across the region and globe currently housing refugees.  Labor will not rule out turn-backs as a final resort, but our policy aims to positively address the need for refugees to get into boats in the first place.

I have confidence that Labor’s position helps restore compassion and integrity to the debate about asylum seeker policy in this country.  It is now up to Tony Abbott and the Coalition to end the politics of division and fear and commit to Australia doing our fair share to deal with what is an unprecedented global humanitarian crisis.

If you are interested in any further detail of Labor’s policy, please go to:  http://www.alp.org.au/asylumseekers

For further reading, you may be interested in the Chief Executive of Save the Children Australia Paul Ronald’s opinion piece for The Australian: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/abbott-must-back-a-genuine-regional-approach-to-asylum-seekers/story-e6frg6zo-1227460713968

Thank you again for contacting me on this extremely important issue.

Best wishes,
Tanya


From: Mike [mailto:mandm.griffin2@bigpond.com] Sent: Friday, 24 July 2015 3:25 PMTo: Griffin, Alan (MP); MacTiernan, Alannah (MP); Rishworth, Amanda (MP); Giles, Andrew (MP); Leigh, Andrew (MP); Burke, Anna (MP); Albanese, Anthony (MP); Byrne, Anthony (MP); Ripoll, Bernie (MP); Shorten, Bill (MP); O'Connor, Brendan (MP); King, Catherine (MP); Bowen, Chris (MP); Hayes, Chris (MP); O'Neil, Clare (MP); Feeney, David (MP); Husic, Ed (MP); Brodtmann, Gai (MP); Gray, Gary (MP); Perrett, Graham (MP); Clare, Jason (MP); J.Macklin.MP@aph.gov.au; Hall, Jill (MP); Chalmers, Jim (MP); Ryan, Joanne (MP); Fitzgibbon, Joel (MP); Collins, Julie (MP); Owens, Julie (MP); Elliot, Justine (MP); Ellis, Kate (MP); Thomson, Kelvin (MP); Ferguson, Laurie (MP); Chesters, Lisa (MP); Vamvakinou, Maria (MP); Butler.MP@aph.gov.au; Dreyfus, Mark (MP); Thistlethwaite, Matt (MP); Parke, Melissa (MP); Danby, Michael (MP); Rowland, Michelle (MP); Champion, Nick (MP); Conroy, Pat (MP); Marles, Richard (MP); Mitchell, Rob (MP); Bird, Sharon (MP); Claydon, Sharon (MP); Neumann, Shayne (MP); Jones, Stephen (MP); Plibersek, Tanya (MP); Butler, Terri (MP); Watts, Tim (MP); Burke, Tony (MP); Zappia, Tony (MP); Snowdon, Warren (MP); Swan, Wayne (MP)Subject: Asylum seekers

Dear Labor Members of Parliament,
This weekend you have the opportunity to break away from the cruel and inhumane asylum seeker policy so ruthlessly pursued by the Abbott government. There are better ways to manage the complex problems of asylum seeker policy. Simply aping the Coalition in a race to the bottom for purely electoral reasons is not the way to go. If you endorse Bill Shorten’s proposal to support turnbacks, then you will lose the support of many sections of the community, who are looking to the ALP to rise above the disgraceful situation that we currently find ourselves in. It’s time to show some spine, some principle and some compassion, and to respect the international conventions and treaties which we, as a nation, have signed up to.

MIke

10.8.15

$10 million splurge to rename Australian Border Force

Prime Minister Tony Abbott at the swearing in ceremony of the inaugural Border Force Commissioner Roman Quaedvlieg with Immigration Minister Peter Dutton last month.
Prime Minister Tony Abbott at the swearing in ceremony of the inaugural Border Force Commissioner Roman Quaedvlieg with Immigration Minister Peter Dutton last month. Photo: Andrew Meares
What's in a name? If you're the newly created Australian Border Force, the answer is about $10 million – splashed on military-style uniforms and thousands of signs at airports and detention centres to create a fresh, hardline image. 
The uniform splurge follows recent reports by former detention centre workers that detainees at the Australian-run camp on Nauru have not been provided proper clothing, forcing parents to cut holes in their children's ill-fitting shoes.   
The swearing in ceremony of the inaugural Border Force Commissioner Roman Quaedvlieg.
The swearing in ceremony of the inaugural Border Force Commissioner Roman Quaedvlieg. Photo: Andrew Meares
Australia's newly named paramilitary border force began operating in July, triggering the 10th rebranding of the immigration bureaucracy since World War II.
The new name drew ridicule when flagged last year, described variously by critics as "hairy chested", deliberately threatening and a "marketing disaster".
Costings supplied to Fairfax Media shows the government spent $6.3 million kitting out 4500 ABF officials with new uniforms, insignia, name badges, buttons and safety helmets.
The Australian Border Force logo.
The Australian Border Force logo.
Veteran public servants were reportedly unhappy at being forced to wear the military-style uniform to work after a lifetime of civilian service.
However a department spokeswoman said the new agency and its law enforcement officers must be "properly attired and well equipped".
"It is custom and practice that uniforms and equipment for law enforcement operatives be provided by their employer," she said.
At a Senate hearing last month detention centre workers described as "horrendous" the clothing situation for detainees at the Nauru detention camp.
"Parents actually had to cut holes in their [children's] sneakers because their feet were growing too much and their shoes were too small," said former worker Samantha Betts.
"Children would often ask us to help fix their thongs, which we tried to do on several occasions … with bread ties and bits of string."
Another case worker said a pair of pink hotpants had been provided to an elderly Burmese woman to wear as shorts.
The government spent a further $3.5 million on other rebranding activities such as new livery for 300 vehicles, including boats, helicopters and other aircraft.
New signs were erected at 11 international airports and more than 700 signs were required for seaports, depots, offices and immigration detention facilities.
About 8000 "Border Watch" signs replaced the previous "Customs Watch" signs. Thousands of vessel port and date stamps were also replaced.
A spokeswoman said the money was sourced from the department's budget allocations and came at "no extra expense to taxpayers".
The government has said the creation of the ABF, which consolidated customs and immigration border operations, would save hundreds of millions of dollars to be reinvested into the super-charged agency.
Some department insiders were said to be unhappy at the "militarisation" of the new regime. The department reportedly faces the public service's greatest executive brain drain since the 1980s after a quarter of its upper ranks were either shown the door or left after the merger.
Despite the millions of dollars being spent on the ABF, its employees are facing cuts to pay and entitlements, triggering an internal revolt.
Since 1945 the immigration bureaucracy has been known by various names including the Department of Labour and Immigration, Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs and the Department of Immigration and Citizenship.
Customs functions have also been rebranded, including in 2009 when the former Labor government dispensed with the Australian Customs Service, renaming it the Australian Customs and Border Protection Service.
At the time, the Coalition questioned the cost of rebranding, and asked why the name change was needed when the government could have simply absorbed border control functions into the Customs Service.

9.8.15

Brisbane student dragged from school and sent to detention centre August 2015

Brisbane student 'dragged on ground', sent to Darwin detention centre

Milad Jafari's wife, Mojgan Shamsalipoor, was forcibly transferred to a Darwin detention centre without a chance to say goodbye to her husband.
Milad Jafari's wife, Mojgan Shamsalipoor, was forcibly transferred to a Darwin detention centre without a chance to say goodbye to her husband. Photo: Supplied
A Brisbane man says he has been left "heartbroken and hopeless" after his wife was forcibly detained by immigration officials and refused permission to say good-bye to her husband before being sent to a Darwin detention centre.
Australian resident Milad Jafari, 21, said his wife, Mojgan Shamsalipoor, also 21, was taken from the Brisbane Immigration Transit Accommodation centre, where she had spent the past eight months and taken to Darwin on Friday.
The following day, more than 100 people gathered in Brisbane city to protest the move and the Border Force Act.
Mr Jafari said his "heart is broken" by the decision.  The couple married in October 2014 and Ms Shamsalipoor was placed in detention in Brisbane after two years in the community, two months later, after her asylum claim was rejected.
Mr Jafari said his wife was determined to continue her schooling, to achieve her dream of being a midwife, and spent her time in detention finishing Year 11 and Year 12. 
She was three months away from graduating from Yeronga High School when she was taken, with Mr Jafari saying she was "dragged on the ground" by officers after she resisted immigration officers and asked to call her husband.
"I have been here for four years, I have been trying to develop as much as I can, you know, I have been trying to be an engineer, she was trying to be a mid-wife, she was always dreaming about this," Mr Jafari said.
"...That is not Australia that is not the country I believe in, it is not the people of Australia – Australian people care about us, they care."
The Immigration Department told the ABC that the move was for operational reasons and it was attempting to resolve cases of failed asylum seekers living in the community, with the expectation they would leave voluntarily, with the option to detain them if they did not co-operate.
But Mr Jafari said his wife had fled an extremely unsafe situation in Iran, which was not easily proved, but had left Ms Shamsalipoor "terrified" of returning.   He also believed that her marriage to him will have put her at further risk, if she was forced to return.
"I haven't been eating, I have been having some trauma at night, I couldn't sleep," he said.
"Deeply...it hurts really hard. It's like they have taken part of me out, they have taken something that was really part of me, they have taken part of me and I can't feel life.  It has been eight months now, and now it is worse.   I haven't been to Darwin, and even I go to Darwin, if they deport her back...do you know what will happen to her?
"Does the Australian people consider this?  Do they know how ugly those governments are in Iran?  They don't.
"...If she goes back to Iran, there will be something really bad happen.  And then, then, I cannot survive.  That is what I am saying to people. I cannot survive."
Yeronga High School teacher Ken Myers, who is also the director of Helping Hands International Australia, a refugee relief centre, said while he had seen a number of students moved previously, he had not "seen anything quite like this before".
"The whole school community is really hurting," he said.
"Our students, our teachers – teachers by nature are typically compassionate people, because that is what the profession requires, you become a teacher because you want to help somebody.
"...I understand the government believes that what they have done is appropriate, and they have worked within the laws they have written, I understand that part, but everyone I talk to, and sure, everyone may not agree with me, but everyone I have spoken to, is saying, 'where is Australia's compassion?'
"...Where is that compassion from Australia?"
Mr Myers said Ms Shamsalipoor had spent four years at the school working hard to be able to contribute to Australian society.
"She was performing, she is an arty type girl and she wants to be a midwife," he said.
"She is doing appropriate subjects to do it and she is getting As, Bs and Cs in everything she is doing to achieve it. 
"She is not a straight A student, but she is a hard worker and she is succeeding in every subject. 
"She wants to be a mid-wife, she wants to contribute to Australia and every indication from her teachers is she will succeed.
"So there is a person here who has the potential to contribute positively to the country – but no, we lock her up in detention."  
Mr Jafari, who will have to leave his family and job to follow Mojgan to Darwin, said all he wanted was the chance for a normal, safe life.
"...I just got married.  Everyone else goes on a honeymoon, everyone else is going to their new house, we have never experienced that.  For 18 years, we have never had a peaceful life. I and my wife only want to live.  Not to have a good job, not to have a great job.  We just want to [contribute] to this country."




http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/brisbane-student-dragged-on-ground-sent-to-darwin-detention-centre-20150808-giuqdx.html

8.8.15

Mohammad Nassim Najafi died in detention centre in Perth


How Mohammad Nasim Najafi died in a detention centre

Two weeks after being beaten and placed in a solitary cell, asylum seeker Mohammad Nasim Najafi was dead. These were his last days.
Supplied
Mohammad Nasim Najafi.

 

It started with a night attack. Three weeks ago, a group of criminals broke into Mohammad Nasim Najafi’s room in the Yongah Hill Immigration Detention Centre outside Perth, scattering his belongings and beating him......

for full story

5.8.15

Newsletter 5 August 2015 - Rural Australians for Refugees Bellingen and Nambucca Districts

Hi Everyone and welcome to the twelve new supporters who signed up at Valla markets last Saturday to our weekly newsletter.

This newsletter is stored here for archival purposes. You can read it by clicking on "read more" below


Guardian article " Manus Island rejected asylum seekers to be deported by PNG"



People who are issued the removal notice are to remain in detention in the mean time, but are warned they “may be held in any location, including correctional institutions, while your removal is being effected”.
In a section headed “Do I have any other options?” the document states “No”.
“You do not have the option of remaining in Papua New Guinea,” it says. “You do not have the option of going to Australia. You will never go to Australia.”
Asylum seekers held on Manus Island who are successful in applying for refugee status are supposed to be resettled in PNG, under the Rudd government’s Regional Resettlement Agreement of July 2013. 
According to a statement by the PNG prime minister, Peter O’Neill, just 129 detainees had been granted refugee status as of May this year. Another 400 had their refugee application rejected and had been deported.