|
A Biloela family of refugees |
M... Griffin has shown me your email reply, dated 5-8-2020, to his email of 27-7-2020 (Seven years too long).
I must take issue with you on several issues in your reply.
You
make the point, on several occasions, that these people detained in
onshore and off-shore detention facilities are illegal, have attempted
to arrive in Australia illegally, or are attempting to subvert our
immigration system. If what they have done is illegal can you please
point out to me which law of the criminal code they have violated? Have
any of these asylum seekers been charged with this crime? Have any of
these asylum seekers been tried for this crime?
|
Refugees locked up indefinitely in Mantra Hotel Melbourne |
Under
international law (specifically the 1951 Refugee Convention) it is not
illegal to seek asylum if one has a well founded fear of persecution.
So, arriving in a leaky boat and claiming asylum is not illegal. I
understand that Australia is a signatory to the Convention so it appears
to me that it is the Australian Government that is acting illegally by
refusing asylum to those in our detention system who are genuine
refugees.
Under
international law, immigration detention is supposed to be
administrative and temporary, not punitive. I believe that this is the
thrust of Mike Griffin's letter, that the continued detention of these
people for seven years can be considered punitive. I despair that our
laws descend into a state where punitive measures are considered normal,
that everyone is considered to be a potential criminal trying to
"flout" or "circumvent" the law, rather than trying to seek the justice
in any particular situation.
You
also state that refugees have the option to return to their own
country. I think you will find that the reason they have been classified
as refugees is because they cannot return to their own country.
|
Free Mantra refugees |
You
state that these people can choose to reside permanently in Nauru or
PNG. I do not think that either of these countries is a safe place to
reside. The Smart Traveller website does not make PNG out to be
particularly safe. For people fleeing persecution it is not a viable
option for most of them.
I
have watched the evolution of Australia's asylum seeker policy over the
past twenty years and it is as depressing as it is inhumane.
International migration is an issue to be managed, not a problem to be
solved. It does nobody any good to keep the people in our detention
centres in a continuous state of punitive incarceration. We could save a
lot of money and the LNP could gain a lot of kudos by finally taking
responsibility for the situation and settling all these people into the
community. Just do it quickly and quietly and move on to more important
issues.
I would hate to be so cynical as to believe that the continued detention of vulnerable people was for political purposes.
|
Free refugees from Australian detention |
Your
claim that Australia has one of the most generous humanitarian programs
in the world can not go unchallenged. While not wanting to denigrate
the good work that is done in this area it is also true that foreign aid
has been cut severely over the past seven years by the LNP federal
government. While we accept less than 20,000 people through refugee
migration per year it pales into insignificance to the four million
displaced Syrians currently residing in Turkey, Lebanon, and Jordan.
Whatever good work we do is poisoned by the petty and vindictive way we
treat asylum seekers who arrive by boat.
Some new thinking is required by you and your government to resolve this issue.
|
Fair go for Refugees |
No comments:
Post a Comment