Dear Mr Hartsuyker, 29.
08. 17
We learned last week that new
category visa has been introduced for around 400 asylum seekers who have been
transferred from offshore detention to Australia for medical treatment. Under
this new visa around 300 adults and 100 children will be required at the very
short notice of 3 weeks to move out of their supported accommodation. Also, as
from this week , and with no prior warning, they will have their meager income
support of $100 per week cancelled. They will be expected to fend for
themselves.
How can they do this if they have
medical conditions or if they have children or other family members to care for
? Some of them are pregnant women or have recently given birth. Most of these
people have had, under their present visa restrictions, no access to job
training or English language tuition. This obviously will restrict their
opportunities for employment . These asylum seekers cannot be returned to Nauru
or Manus Islands as these detention centres are due to close in the next few
weeks.
The real aim of these new
regulations is to force this group of asylum seekers back to their own war-torn
countries to face renewed risk of persecution and possible death. As you know,
under international law it is not a crime to flee political violence or war or
to seek safety by crossing international borders. These asylum seekers are
within their rights to expect refuge yet they are being treated like criminals
and pawns in a political game.
To introduce these new policies in
such a sudden and cruel way is one of the most inhumane and extreme decisions
made by The Department of Immigration in some time. Our government seems
determined to punish the most vulnerable in our society for political ends.
This newly introduced visa is an
affront to Australian values of compassion and humanity and all decent minded
Australians will oppose these measures.
I would like to know whether you
support these policies as I would not want to cast my vote in favour of any
candidate that agreed with these inhumane decisions.
Yours sincerely,
Marlene Griffin
No comments:
Post a Comment